Quiz — فقرات طازجة نحو التعبير الكتابي في اللغة الإنجليزية للشعب العلمية بكالوريا 2020.pdf

Question 1 sur 10 20:00

[{"id":11133,"question":"Which of the following is a correct way to start a paragraph in a scientific essay?","option_a":"In this essay, I will discuss...","option_b":"It is commonly known that...","option_c":"The purpose of this study is to...","option_d":"As far as I am concerned...","option_e":"","option_f":"","bonne_reponse":"c","explication":"La réponse correcte est 'The purpose of this study is to...' car elle introduit clairement l'objectif de l'essai de manière formelle et scientifique.","points":1,"type":"qcm","actif":1,"section_id":null,"ordre":0,"_debug_answer_data_type":"string","_debug_answer_data_preview":"{\"correct\": \"c\", \"options\": {\"a\": \"In this essay, I will discuss...\", \"b\": \"It is commonly known tha","_debug_options_count":4},{"id":11134,"question":"True or False: Using contractions (e.g., 'don't', 'can't') is acceptable in formal scientific writing.","option_a":"Vrai","option_b":"Faux","option_c":"","option_d":"","option_e":"","option_f":"","bonne_reponse":"b","explication":"Faux. Les contractions sont évitées dans les écrits scientifiques formels pour maintenir un ton professionnel.","points":1,"type":"qcm","actif":1,"section_id":null,"ordre":0,"_debug_answer_data_type":"string","_debug_answer_data_preview":"{\"correct\": \"b\", \"options\": {\"a\": \"Vrai\", \"b\": \"Faux\", \"c\": \"\", \"d\": \"\"}}","_debug_options_count":4},{"id":11135,"question":"Which transition word is most appropriate to add a contrasting idea in a paragraph?","option_a":"Moreover","option_b":"However","option_c":"In addition","option_d":"Therefore","option_e":"","option_f":"","bonne_reponse":"b","explication":"'However' est utilisé pour introduire une idée contrastante, tandis que les autres mots suggèrent une continuation ou une conclusion.","points":1,"type":"qcm","actif":1,"section_id":null,"ordre":0,"_debug_answer_data_type":"string","_debug_answer_data_preview":"{\"correct\": \"b\", \"options\": {\"a\": \"Moreover\", \"b\": \"However\", \"c\": \"In addition\", \"d\": \"Therefore\"}}","_debug_options_count":4},{"id":11136,"question":"True or False: Passive voice should never be used in scientific writing.","option_a":"Vrai","option_b":"Faux","option_c":"","option_d":"","option_e":"","option_f":"","bonne_reponse":"b","explication":"Faux. La voix passive est couramment utilisée dans les écrits scientifiques pour mettre l'accent sur les résultats plutôt que sur l'auteur.","points":1,"type":"qcm","actif":1,"section_id":null,"ordre":0,"_debug_answer_data_type":"string","_debug_answer_data_preview":"{\"correct\": \"b\", \"options\": {\"a\": \"Vrai\", \"b\": \"Faux\", \"c\": \"\", \"d\": \"\"}}","_debug_options_count":4},{"id":11137,"question":"Which of the following phrases is suitable for concluding a scientific paragraph?","option_a":"In conclusion, it can be said that...","option_b":"To sum up, I think...","option_c":"As a result, we can observe that...","option_d":"In my opinion, the findings show...","option_e":"","option_f":"","bonne_reponse":"a","explication":"'In conclusion, it can be said that...' est une phrase neutre et formelle adaptée à une conclusion scientifique.","points":1,"type":"qcm","actif":1,"section_id":null,"ordre":0,"_debug_answer_data_type":"string","_debug_answer_data_preview":"{\"correct\": \"a\", \"options\": {\"a\": \"In conclusion, it can be said that...\", \"b\": \"To sum up, I think.","_debug_options_count":4},{"id":11138,"question":"True or False: Using rhetorical questions is an effective way to engage the reader in a scientific essay.","option_a":"Vrai","option_b":"Faux","option_c":"","option_d":"","option_e":"","option_f":"","bonne_reponse":"b","explication":"Faux. Les questions rhétoriques sont généralement évitées dans les écrits scientifiques pour maintenir un ton objectif.","points":1,"type":"qcm","actif":1,"section_id":null,"ordre":0,"_debug_answer_data_type":"string","_debug_answer_data_preview":"{\"correct\": \"b\", \"options\": {\"a\": \"Vrai\", \"b\": \"Faux\", \"c\": \"\", \"d\": \"\"}}","_debug_options_count":4},{"id":11139,"question":"Which of the following is an example of a formal expression to introduce a cause?","option_a":"Because of this...","option_b":"As a result of...","option_c":"Due to the fact that...","option_d":"So, the reason is...","option_e":"","option_f":"","bonne_reponse":"c","explication":"'Due to the fact that...' est une expression formelle pour introduire une cause, tandis que les autres options sont moins adaptées au registre scientifique.","points":1,"type":"qcm","actif":1,"section_id":null,"ordre":0,"_debug_answer_data_type":"string","_debug_answer_data_preview":"{\"correct\": \"c\", \"options\": {\"a\": \"Because of this...\", \"b\": \"As a result of...\", \"c\": \"Due to the f","_debug_options_count":4},{"id":11140,"question":"True or False: It is acceptable to use personal pronouns (e.g., 'I', 'we') in a scientific essay.","option_a":"Vrai","option_b":"Faux","option_c":"","option_d":"","option_e":"","option_f":"","bonne_reponse":"b","explication":"Faux. Les pronoms personnels sont généralement évités dans les écrits scientifiques pour maintenir un ton impersonnel.","points":1,"type":"qcm","actif":1,"section_id":null,"ordre":0,"_debug_answer_data_type":"string","_debug_answer_data_preview":"{\"correct\": \"b\", \"options\": {\"a\": \"Vrai\", \"b\": \"Faux\", \"c\": \"\", \"d\": \"\"}}","_debug_options_count":4},{"id":11141,"question":"Which of the following phrases is best suited to present a hypothesis in a scientific context?","option_a":"I believe that...","option_b":"It is hypothesized that...","option_c":"Maybe the result is...","option_d":"I think that...","option_e":"","option_f":"","bonne_reponse":"b","explication":"'It is hypothesized that...' est une phrase formelle et appropriée pour présenter une hypothèse dans un contexte scientifique.","points":1,"type":"qcm","actif":1,"section_id":null,"ordre":0,"_debug_answer_data_type":"string","_debug_answer_data_preview":"{\"correct\": \"b\", \"options\": {\"a\": \"I believe that...\", \"b\": \"It is hypothesized that...\", \"c\": \"Mayb","_debug_options_count":4},{"id":11142,"question":"True or False: Using informal language (e.g., 'stuff', 'thing') is acceptable in scientific writing.","option_a":"Vrai","option_b":"Faux","option_c":"","option_d":"","option_e":"","option_f":"","bonne_reponse":"a","explication":"Faux. Le langage informel est à éviter dans les écrits scientifiques pour garantir la précision et le professionnalisme.","points":1,"type":"qcm","actif":1,"section_id":null,"ordre":0,"_debug_answer_data_type":"string","_debug_answer_data_preview":"{\"correct\": \"a\", \"options\": {\"a\": \"Vrai\", \"b\": \"Faux\", \"c\": \"\", \"d\": \"\"}}","_debug_options_count":4}]